Choose rejects Amber Heard’s request to put aside $10 million judgment awarded to Johnny Depp

A Virginia decide on Wednesday rejected an effort by actress Amber Heard to put aside the $10 million judgment awarded towards her in favor of her ex-husband, Johnny Depp.

Depp gained a defamation go well with towards Heard final month in a high-profile civil trial. Heard gained a smaller, $2 million judgment on a counterclaim she filed towards Depp.

Earlier this month, Heard filed a movement looking for to have Depp’s verdict put aside, or have a mistrial declared. Her attorneys cited a number of components, together with an obvious case of mistaken id with one of many jurors.

In a written order, Choose Penney Azcarate rejected all of Heard’s claims and mentioned the juror subject particularly was irrelevant and that Heard cannot present she was prejudiced.

“The juror was vetted, sat for all the jury, deliberated, and reached a verdict. The one proof earlier than this Courtroom is that this juror and all jurors adopted their oaths, the Courtroom’s directions, and orders. This Courtroom is sure by the competent determination of the jury,” Azcarate wrote.


Johnny Depp noticed in Newcastle, England bar after libel case verdict

00:12

Depp sued for $50 million in Fairfax County after Heard wrote a 2018 op-ed piece in The Washington Publish about home violence by which she referred to herself as “a public determine representing home abuse.” The article by no means talked about Depp by title, however his attorneys mentioned a number of passages within the article defamed him by implication by referring to extremely publicized abuse allegations she made in 2016 as she filed for divorce.

Heard then filed a $100 million counterclaim, additionally for defamation. By the point the case went to trial, her counterclaim had been whittled down to some statements made by considered one of Depp’s attorneys, who referred to as Heard’s abuse allegations a hoax.

The jury awarded $15 million to Depp and $2 million to Heard on her counterclaim. The $15 million judgment was diminished to $10.35 million as a result of Virginia regulation caps punitive damages at $350,000.

The decide didn’t spell out rationale for rejecting Heard’s different claims in Wednesday’s order.

Amongst different issues, Heard argued that the $10 million verdict is unsupported by the information, and appears to display that jurors did not concentrate on the fallout from the 2018 op-ed piece — as they have been speculated to do — and as a substitute simply seemed broadly on the injury Depp’s status suffered on account of the alleged abuse.


Amber Heard’s legal professional Elaine Bredehoft on verdict and what’s subsequent

06:30

Heard’s attorneys additionally argued argue that the verdicts for Depp on one hand and Heard on the opposite are basically nonsensical.

“The jury’s dueling verdicts are inconsistent and irreconcilable,” her attorneys, Elaine Bredehoft and Benjamin Rottenborn, wrote.

Heard’s attorneys additionally challenged the decision on the idea that one of many seven jurors who determined the case was by no means summoned for jury responsibility. Based on courtroom papers, a 77-year-old county resident obtained a jury summons. However the man’s son, who has the identical title and lives on the similar tackle, responded to the summons and served in his stead.

Heard’s attorneys argued that Virginia regulation is strict about juror identities, and the case of mistaken id is grounds for a mistrial. They introduced no proof that the 52-year-old son, recognized in courtroom papers solely as Juror #15, purposefully or insidiously sought to interchange his father, however they argue that risk shouldn’t be discounted.

“The Courtroom can not assume, as Mr. Depp asks it to, that Juror 15’s apparently improper service was an harmless mistake. It may have been an intentional try to serve on the jury of a high-profile case,” Heard’s attorneys wrote.

Heard nonetheless has the power to attraction the decision to the Virginia Courtroom of Appeals. The problems introduced to the appellate courtroom may effectively be totally different from the problems Azacarate rejected Wednesday.

Supply hyperlink

Subscribe to our newsletter
Sign up here to get the latest news, updates and special offers delivered directly to your inbox.
Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.